Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
Key Takeaways
- Colleges have automated the straightforward work (CRM, communication) while the hardest, most labor-intensive work (transcript analysis, fraud checks) stays guide.
- Enrollment growth targets are outpacing the processing capability needed to deal with more purposes.
- Admissions leaders need AI to lengthen employees capability, not change human judgment on consequential choices.u003cbru003e
Higher schooling has invested in digital transformation for years. Colleges have adopted scholar info systems, buyer relationship management platforms, online software portals and more and more refined communication instruments. Yet many admissions groups still face vital operational challenges.
EDMO’s The State of Automation in Admissions Report 2026 provides a nearer look at that contradiction. Our online survey of 40 greater schooling leaders at U.S. schools and universities examined enrollment priorities, automation maturity, processing workloads, artificial intelligence and scholar communication.
The findings reveal an fascinating divide. While 80% of respondents reported automating CRM and information synchronization and 75% reported automating scholar communication, only 12.5% reported automating transcript and credit analysis. Identity and fraud checks were automated by just 17.5%.
These findings counsel that establishments have made appreciable progress in automating routine administrative actions. However, some of the processes that require the most employees effort stay largely guide.
For business leaders beyond greater schooling, the distinction is important: introducing automation is not the same as eradicating the bottlenecks that constrain an group.
The most tough work is typically the least automated
Among surveyed leaders, 70% recognized staffing and workload as a main admissions problem. Data silos and system integration adopted at 50%, while 47.5% cited transcript and credit analysis.
These pressures become simpler to perceive when trying at the processes that stay guide. Nearly two-thirds of respondents recognized transcript and credit analysis as largely guide. Document consumption and indexing, along with identification and fraud checks, were each cited by 52.5%.
International transcripts current an extra problem. Some 72.5% of respondents recognized them among the most tough paperwork to course of, reflecting the complexity of evaluating completely different academic systems, grading scales and educational data.
The broader lesson is that organizations should study where work becomes sophisticated, not merely where it is best to deploy technology.
For an admissions workplace, that may imply understanding how long a transcript waits for analysis, how many instances an incomplete doc strikes between groups and how continuously employees must appropriate or re-enter info.
Automating these processes requires more than digitizing paperwork. It requires workflows succesful of managing inconsistent info, handling exceptions and connecting the systems concerned.
Enrollment ambitions are transferring quicker than operational readiness
The survey also reveals a rigidity between institutional priorities and operational capability.
Growing enrollment and reaching new markets was ranked the highest precedence by 67.5% of respondents. Increasing yield and conversion emerged as the next main precedence, with 55% assigning it second place.
Yet 47.5% rated their establishment’s admissions automation maturity at three out of 5. Budget constraints were cited as a barrier by 65%, adopted carefully by change management and employees readiness at 62.5%. Integration complexity affected 45%.
This mixture creates a planning problem. An establishment may efficiently increase purposes but uncover that its analysis, verification and determination workflows can not develop at the same tempo.
That makes operational capability an important half of any enrollment strategy.
Before committing to greater software targets, establishments should study their processing capability, establish their most time-consuming actions and assess whether current systems can support extra quantity.
Technology investments also need to account for employees readiness. A promising AI software provides restricted sensible worth if it can not combine with current systems or if staff lack the coaching and confidence to use it successfully.
Student communication is more and more a capability concern
Admissions operations are not restricted to processing paperwork and making choices. Institutions must also reply to college students who need clarification about software necessities, financial assist, switch credit and admission standing.
The survey discovered that 47.5% of respondents reported average inquiry response instances of two to 24 hours. Another 15% reported response instances exceeding 24 hours.
Meanwhile, 72.5% said their establishments did not present around-the-clock applicant support. Nearly half reported that 20–40% of scholar inquiries required employees intervention.
These findings raise an important query: how much time should admissions professionals spend answering repetitive questions when they also handle complicated evaluations and consequential choices?
Automated communication can deal with routine requests, present software updates and make info accessible outside conventional working hours. However, establishments must still set up clear escalation paths for questions that require personal help or skilled judgment.
The goal should be to improve access to info while making certain employees stay accessible for interactions where their experience is important.
Fraud considerations make human oversight important
Growing fraud considerations add another dimension to admissions automation.
Within the surveyed group, 65% reported an increase in software or financial-aid fraud during the previous two years. That included 40% who reported a vital increase and 25% who reported a considerably elevated stage.
At the same time, 52.5% relied on guide identification verification, while only 15% reported utilizing automated identification verification.
Institutions therefore face two competing pressures: processing purposes more effectively while sustaining dependable verification and applicable safeguards.
The findings also counsel that admissions leaders are not trying to take away people from these processes. When requested about the significance of human review of AI outcomes, 65% assigned a ranking of 4 or 5 on a five-point scale.
This factors toward a model in which technology assists with extracting info, figuring out inconsistencies, routing exceptions and supporting administrative choices, while people stay accountable for reviewing consequential outcomes.
For establishments introducing AI, oversight should be half of the unique workflow design rather than an extra requirement launched after deployment.
The actual measure of automation is capability
The most helpful conclusion from this analysis is not that schools need more AI. It is that establishments need a clearer understanding of where automation can meaningfully improve their operations.
Student communication and information synchronization are important, but automating these actions alone does not resolve the difficulties concerned in evaluating transcripts, verifying applicant identities or managing complicated purposes.
Institutions should start by figuring out the work that consumes the most employees time, analyzing how info strikes between systems and figuring out which actions require skilled judgment.
They should then measure automation against operational outcomes: processing instances, employees hours, exception charges, response capability and the high quality of human review.
For leaders in any industry, the precept is related. The worth of automation should not be judged merely by the quantity of duties accomplished without human involvement. Its larger worth lies in creating the capability for people to focus on the work that issues most.
Key Takeaways
- Colleges have automated the straightforward work (CRM, communication) while the hardest, most labor-intensive work (transcript analysis, fraud checks) stays guide.
- Enrollment growth targets are outpacing the processing capability needed to deal with more purposes.
- Admissions leaders need AI to lengthen employees capability, not change human judgment on consequential choices.u003cbru003e
Higher schooling has invested in digital transformation for years. Colleges have adopted scholar info systems, buyer relationship management platforms, online software portals and more and more refined communication instruments. Yet many admissions groups still face vital operational challenges.
EDMO’s The State of Automation in Admissions Report 2026 provides a nearer look at that contradiction. Our online survey of 40 greater schooling leaders at U.S. schools and universities examined enrollment priorities, automation maturity, processing workloads, artificial intelligence and scholar communication.
The findings reveal an fascinating divide. While 80% of respondents reported automating CRM and information synchronization and 75% reported automating scholar communication, only 12.5% reported automating transcript and credit analysis. Identity and fraud checks were automated by just 17.5%.